Quantcast
Jump to content

Path USB


PepeSan

Recommended Posts

Hola, soy nuevo por aquí y con poca experiencia en desarrollo en la plataforma de webOS, actualmente estoy desarrollando una app que me permita tener una interfaz personalizada para leer archivos desde una USB conectada directamente a la Smart TV, el problema es que no encuentro la manera de poder obtener los archivos del USB.

Sabes si existe una manera de hacerlo?...

En un proyecto para desarrollo de Samsung TV lo logré mediante este path: 

code

.

.

<img src="/dtv/usb/sda1/adult/imgs/image.jpg" width="400px" height="auto" >//Imagen que se carga desde USB

.

.

code

 

Cualquier ayuda o comentario sería de gran utilidad y seguro salvaría mi puesto en la empresa :S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Muchas gracias por la respuesta uragan1987, sabes si este path está probado y funciona?... 
En mi proyecto después de buscar y buscar, nunca encontré una solución y tuve que montar un servidor local desde donde consumía el recurso de esta manera: http://192.168.0.X/recurso/imagen.jpg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By News Reporter
      Google's Android software is available on quite literally hundreds of devices. But on all but a select few it's been tinkered with at a bare minimum (or wholesale overhauled), moving it away from a 'true' Android experience. In fact, the number of 'Google' devices, i.e. those with unadulterated Android installed out of the box, can be counted on two hands. most of those are
      link hidden, please login to view. That's not to say that there's anything wrong with the modifications made by Samsung, HTC, Sony, Amazon, and everybody else toying with Android, but there's a contingent of people that want to be able to install stock Android on their device without the interference of others. Part of the code to make that possible has always been available as part of the (AOSP). Anybody can download that and do with it as they please, and installing it on a device should yield a 'pure' Android experience. So long as you're okay with probably not having access to a number of vital components with drivers that aren't open source and thus aren't part of AOSP. That hasn't stopped groups like CyanogenMod from repurposing the open source code of AOSP, including the project to install Android on the TouchPad.
      Google's head of the AOSP, Jean-Baptiste Queru, isn't content with that, and wants to bring the pure, unadulterated Android experience to more devices. . Despite Sony's history of siloing themselves off in proprietary technologies (MiniDisc and Memory Stick, anyone?), they've recently come to terms with being more open and have become more . So it should come as no surprise that a few weeks after Queru started his quest to bring AOSP to the Xperia S, . While such code won't be useful to the average homebrew ROM cooker, they should prove quite useful to the Xperia S AOSP project.
      We've said before that the biggest technical hurdle facing the adoption of Open webOS on the vast majority of devices is the lack of open source supporting software like the drivers and whatnot in the Xperia S binaries. With Google publicly pursuing getting stock Android onto at least one non-Nexus device, we have to wonder if this approach might be a useful one for HP and Open webOS.
      As of right now there are two forms of , both in beta: installations, and another for . The Linux version isn't exactly a cakewalk to install outside of the instructions provided by HP, so throwing it on that tablet you have sitting around isn't a simple task. And while the OpenEmbedded-enabled version of Open webOS is technically installable on any number of theoretical devices, it's missing a fairly major component: a user interface.
      But let's assume that HP's plans involve setting up Open webOS to run on more devices than just a 32-bit install of Linux Ubuntu, because that's simply not going to be useful to most people. In fact, we have to question whether it'd really be useful to any but a select handful. But thanks to a distinct lack of open source drivers for many things, there aren't a whole lot of options for Open webOS. That is, unless a company such a Sony is willing to step up as they have with the Android Open Source Project and pitch in useful code to make exciting things happen.
      While there's the obvious advantage to webOS enthusiasts such as ourselves who strongly desire to run webOS on new hardware, there's an advantage for the assisting device manufacturer as well. We're not talking about just goodwill here, of which there'd be plenty from a yearning-to-offer-goodwill webOS community. No, there's the advantage that said manufacturer would have an additional operating system in their quiver should they want to take the webOS route, and they'd have let the community do most of the work for them.




×
×
  • Create New...